Venezuela's self-esteem (II / II)

A loser is not compromised and always says, and do my work and that's pretty Manuel Barroso in his analysis indicates that in Venezuela there are two types of Venezuelans. Triangles are essential differences, processes, self-esteem, ways of being, feeling and thinking that created the duality, the paradoxes, no ecology, no conscience, nonsystemic raw, because there are Venezuelans buried in his denial of grow and there are Venezuelans believe in the right to be, and have power. It is noted that when commenting on values ​​and norms, is referring to the ethical development of Venezuela. It is impossible, with so much confusion, to be clear and to define what are the true values ​​and the ethical nature of Venezuela. Venezuelan values ​​from different sources. The Venezuelan marginal says one thing and does another. Overall, the Venezuelan live informally, gradually, between the value and not value the ethical and unethical. Our educational system has lost sight and mystical. All our educational system is marginal. Programs, salaries, job sites, the resources, training and personal attention of worthy people. To educate is to discover the potential and focus on specific country.

To educate candidates must have been educated, have grown. There are teachers who must mystical about recognition and vision and self-esteem. The Venezuelan must realize that education and growth would be the only thing that would break their existence and feel marginally. The Venezuelan, with self-awareness and social context, is finding more and more ways to deal with all that widespread abuse call "economic package", "inflation", "police operations", study circles, training, cooperatives continuing education, action groups, popular education. . . Changed needs, contexts and behaviors. The Venezuelan has been arrested, neglected and hopeless. We add, that when there is a clear awareness of the needs and capacities of their own, it is difficult to know which path to take, what direction to give life, concrete things you like, with the immediate aim of optimizing the life, live. The Venezuelan living in the open. No plans, resources and alternatives ignored. More interested in possession of something to be master of himself. The Venezuelan, forgetful of self, do not see how it will be within ten or fifteen years. In "Enemies of the Fifth Republic? (Miró, 2001), reads: Venezuela, it takes some serious things, not afraid of danger, include search, likes awards, decorations, praise, etc.., No matter who has not earned or merit is that of another person is creative and witty, it's hypocritical, has double-sided, ahead says one thing and does another behind; suggests, promises or recommend things, but it does what it says or recommends, it costs to maintain continuity in the undertaking, it is good for short campaigns, for operating, but not for the work in the medium and long term, conformist, expects others to take the lead to problems, preferring others to do things, disorganized, undisciplined , less predictable and improviser, he likes to live the present, without planning the future or worry too much about him, no sense of care and respect, loves to take advantage without effort, he likes to be free (freedom in their own way, not likes to be controlled, does not like the rules, their excessive love of freedom leads to anarchy, to disrespect the law and submit to the authority with difficulty) it is tolerant, but demanding with others.

In terms of objectives for the country.

Of course, we must not forget also in this analysis, that Venezuela is a people called to great destinies ... Venezuela has always been the conviction that something big is going to make ... our people having already played a role in history, you can do great things .... We have been happy with the rhetoric, see the future in the printing paper. (Adriani, A, 1937.285). You can not ignore that the country also has repeatedly has gone adrift, with plans, with operations, with management based synthetic very informality of our events. It gives a lot of improvisation. Large contrasts are manifested in the actions of their ruler, it shows little unity of its people full integration in favor of taking the country forward. Much division, opposition that leaves a lot to say, lack of leadership in political culture. The fact, that in studying the subject is determined, which affects self-esteem within the Venezuelan social development, because each person meets their needs within a specific context. Individual needs require an individual context. The couple, a family context. The family needs require the family, the organizational context organizational and social needs, a social context.

(Barroso, M. 1987.143). Impossible is said to live outside of the context. Since we wake up until we go to bed, still asleep, we are within a context. We went from one context to another, permanent transitions, without realizing that the only way that our needs are met is to be in context. Being out of context would imply changes in the ways we relate to ourselves and the world around us .- Each context consists of eight elements: time, space, maps and other resources, alternatives, values ​​and norms. These elements are common to different contexts, but interacting with different types of needs: individual, couple, family, organizational, community, in different ways, forming different configurations, with varying results. If one of the members fails, the whole system fails context, if one of the contexts collapses, the whole system collapses, originating in the individual disorders. Disorders were recorded at different levels: physiological, chemical, emotional, social. The uprooting, marginalization, no conscience, no expressions of identity are contextual mismatches. The social context of duality tells us that 80% of Venezuelans coming from the destriangulización, difficulties of belonging, of identity, interact and socialize, drown without reaching structure other contexts.

They are out of context, misleading create forms that allow them to survive through an emergency mechanisms struggle to meet their basic needs. This is the marginal Venezuelan who lives in the immediate, inside his impairment, with maps of neglect and irresponsibility to himself and others. Obey, pleased, flattered, flattering to others, and through self-disqualification feel valued. Of course, all this must be added once the sea as already mentioned such as the role of values ​​in the Venezuelan who has recently left a lot to say about it yal can indicate that there are also positive and negative things that have emerged most recently in Venezuela, as this has good feelings, likes to please, be nice people but they were given to live, to benefit, with a great need to survive at all costs, making it important in relative killing, stealing, were behaviors of others before our people. Today, steals, threatens, kills himself with a stunning insensitivity of the authorities and citizens, showing disrespect for life, the dignity of others and, above all, ignorance of the rights of the individual.

It is impossible, with so much confusion, to be clear and to define what are the true values ​​and the ethical nature of Venezuela. Barroso reminds us that the values ​​of Venezuelans came from different sources. On the one hand the maps of ex-convicts, pardoned by the king, now tucked conquerors, captains general and governors, on the other teachings of a religion alien to Indian imported very rigid fanaticism and inquisition, performed by priests and religious, many conveniences as apostolic and personal limitations, and finally as heartless wanted to come to make a fortune and settle by force. The Venezuelan marginal says one thing and does another. Not compromised. Today morning denied claims. Today sentence absolves morning. The laws exist and are beautiful but their applications do not always conform to the sacredness of the law itself, but the personality of the application. The same daily events requires many adjustments on the fly, sometimes inaccurate and suspect. Overall, the Venezuelan live informally, gradually, between the value and not value the ethical and unethical. CONCLUSIONS The current situation invites the Venezuelan rescue their self-esteem, identify himself more respect and respect for others, you must build a strong ego and self-deprecation make suicide.

They are the Self (thinking of oneself), self (how we Hustad) and self-efficacy (how much confidence you have in yourself). Trying to be more flexible, both with others like himself. Not using criteria to evaluate dichotomous extreme reality. Review the goals and possibilities to achieve not think ill of himself. Be more kind to your actions. Be aware that you exist, it is important and think you are entitled to dwarf all things is necessary that the current government bailout encourages and Venezuelan education. Education is the only alternative. The model is sold out. Changed needs, contexts and behaviors. The Venezuelan has been arrested, neglected and hopeless. The leaders are gone. There have opposition, the government knows this and this has led to serious conflicts. No respite leadership, it seems that the opposition does not realize the necessity of their role to ensure that Venezuela's self-esteem does not deteriorate. * References: .- Barroso, Manuel. Venezuela's self-esteem: Democracy or Marginality., Caracas. Venezuela. Editorial Galac. Pgs. 3-353. .- Riso, Walter. Learn to love each other mismo.Editorial Standard SA Different websites .- Notes from the chair .- Organizational Behavior.

Virtual classroom program quality management and productivity of faces, Universidad de Carabobo

...